While many global trade corridors are softening, the Asia–Oceania region continues to display relative strength heading into Q4 2025. Sustained intra-Asian demand, inventory restocking, and preparations for the Lunar New Year are keeping this corridor buoyant, even as North America and Europe experience tapering volumes. Port congestion across major Australian gateways — particularly Melbourne and Sydney — remains moderate but persistent, with average vessel delays of four to eight days. Container availability, especially for 20-foot and reefer equipment, remains tight due to strong export demand and slower container repositioning. Shipping lines are also recalibrating schedules to optimise vessel utilisation, while feeder connections through Singapore and Port Klang are experiencing increased pressure from regional transshipments.
Impact
Exporters may find stronger bargaining power for space and rates on Asia-Oceania lanes compared to global routes that are still recovering from overcapacity.
Importers could face sporadic equipment shortages and higher terminal storage charges as yard utilisation rises.
Increased competition for containers may cause temporary surcharges or booking prioritisation for high-volume shippers.
Reliable regional connectivity may encourage smaller exporters to shift focus from long-haul Europe/US routes to nearer Asian destinations.
Action
Book vessel space at least three weeks in advance, particularly for reefer and 20-foot containers.
Monitor port congestion updates through your forwarder and maintain flexibility with alternate terminals or sailing schedules.
Negotiate with carriers or forwarders for multi-port acceptance to mitigate risk of rollover.
For importers, secure container release as early as possible to avoid demurrage and detention costs.
Strong regional trade calls for strong partnerships — trust Flying Fox Solutions to keep your Asia–Oceania cargo moving on time.
Source: Seabridge Global Logistics Market Update, October 2025.
Disclaimer – Market data is from public sources we consider reliable but has not been independently verified; accuracy is not guaranteed